And cropping the conjunction pictures worked just fine. I'll be almost 95 when the next one comes along, so I might not need one then.
I don't own a TC, not ever needing anything beyond 400 mm except for the Jupiter-Saturn conjunction. I never completely got the hang of the 17mm, but think I'd find the 24mm much more useful if I bought one. Last year I rented the 24mm and later the 17mm. here is his review of the TS-E24 MkII but dive deeper into his site for all things tilt and shift, from custom lens brackets to focusing when using tilt, to printable tilt tables for specific ‘J’ point distances (along with an explanation of ‘J’ Point distances)! The best resource on the internet for tilt shift and Canon in particular is Kieth over at NorthLight Images, he actually posts here sometimes too. Horizontal shift on the TS-E24 MkII is 12mm either way, so you end up with an effective 24mm x 50mm sensor from a simple two shot horizontal shift stitch, but there are several ways to actually increase the effective sensor area more. I actually have the TS-E17 and the TS-E50, with TC’s that gives me 17, 24, 34, 50, 70, and 100 T/S’s. I used to use the naked 17 a lot, now tastes have changed and I rarely use it without a TC, if I lost the 17 and could only buy one lens to replace it it would be the 24 MkII. The shift stitched 24 gives you a horizontal 17 anyway and the stitched 17 is just too wide for most things. I have the 17 and use both 1.4 and 2x TC’s with it to good effect, but the 24 MkII is a much sharper lens than the 17 and in general more versatile. Although it isn’t difficult to do it isn’t designed to do it often and it can’t realistically be done in the field. The second massive improvement in the MkII was the independent rotation of the tilt and the shift functions, in the MkI the lens comes one way and that is it unless you remove screws and reset it. The main improvements are the MkII has very little CA even when shifted, which is very problematic on the MkI and sometimes not not able to be removed. The MkII is much better and if you can swing it I’d recommend getting the MkII. Hi cayenne, there is a massive difference between the TS-E 24 MkI and MkII. Off topic a little.I was watching YouTube and saw that Schneider had put out what appears to be some VERY large image circle TS lenses.a couple I think were actually made large enough to project large format or maybe medium format film image circles.Īnyway, back to canon.I've always kinda wanted to play with TS and as I've started looking I"ve run into some questions so was hoping for some advice from the pros here. I've also hears that some people get the 17mm and use a tele converter on it.to basically get what is essentially 2-for-1 with the 17mm and then with the converter on it, approx 24mm.?Īlso, if you use the 24mm to shoot a panoramic with the shift function.what are the dimensions you end up with? Hoping in particular sees this, and that I know he uses the TS lenses a lot. While I usually wait and save to get the later versions.just curious in this case if it is worth it. I know the lens is sharp and a great performer.but not sure between the versions.
I'm excited to get one to not only shoot on my trusty 5D3.but also since the circle image is large, it would be fun adapted to my gfx100, and heck.I'd have fun adapting it to ANY mirrorless camera I happen to be playing with. Is there very much difference between the two? Enough for a large price difference? I was researching and found out there is a version 1 and a version 2. Ok, I still have GAS.and now looking to maybe get a Tilt Shift lens and eyeballing a 24mm one.
0 kommentar(er)
